Skip to content
26 October 2026

Bill would pair federal dollars with state funding to eliminate college debt

A fresh congressional proposal ties federal money to state funding, targeting full cost coverage for public‑college students and expanding aid to DREAMers.

Bill would pair federal dollars with state funding to eliminate college debt

The Debt-Free College Act of 2026 (S. 5403 in the Senate and H.R. 10455 in the House) seeks to create a partnership between the federal government and the states so that students can enroll in their home-state public colleges without needing loans. Introduced by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI), the legislation would require participating states to cover every element of a student’s unmet need—the gap between the cost of attendance and all existing grants.

According to the bill’s sponsors, student debt extends far beyond tuition; it includes books, housing, food, and other essentials. By matching a state’s net operating support for public colleges dollar for dollar, the proposal aims to replace borrowing with grant aid, while also introducing a separate $3 billion stream for historically Black, tribal, and other minority-serving institutions.

Core requirements of the federal-state partnership

States that opt in must meet several conditions. First, they must freeze tuition and fee levels at the amounts in effect when the law is enacted, allowing only inflation-linked increases thereafter. Second, each state’s per-student funding cannot drop below the average of the previous three fiscal years. Third, a five-year state-wide plan with annual benchmarks is required, mirroring the accountability framework used in existing federal programs.

When a state joins, the federal government provides a grant equal to the state’s net operating support for its public colleges—excluding merit scholarships, capital projects, research funds, hospital costs, and athletic budgets. The combined pool is then allocated in a strict order: Pell Grant recipients with the highest unmet need receive aid first, followed by other low-income students. Administrative costs may consume up to 1 % of the total, but no portion can be diverted to endowments or sports facilities.

Financial scope and eligibility details

The legislation authorizes $84 billion for fiscal year 2027, with provisions for “such sums as may be necessary” through fiscal 2036. While Congress must appropriate those funds each year, the bill’s design ensures that the federal match scales directly with each participating state’s commitment.

Under the plan, a student whose Student Aid Index is zero or negative at an average public four-year college (cost of attendance $30,990 for 2026-27) would qualify for the maximum Pell Grant of $7,395. If the state adds a $5,000 grant, the remaining gap—approximately $18,600—would still be covered by the federal match, eliminating the need for private loans. The proposal also earmarks $3 billion for HBCUs, tribal colleges, and other minority-serving institutions, extending aid to private nonprofit schools where at least 35 % of students receive Pell Grants.

In a notable expansion, the bill would permit certain undocumented students—often called DREAMers—to access Pell Grants and other federal aid. Eligibility would require that the individual entered the United States before age 16, graduated from a U.S. high school, completed at least two years of post-secondary study, or served four years in the uniformed services.

Legislative progress and political outlook

Both the Senate HELP Committee and the House Education and Workforce Committee have received the bills, but they have not yet been scheduled for a full committee vote. This marks the fifth time Schatz and Pocun have re-introduced the concept, with earlier versions in 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2023 failing to advance. All current cosponsors are Democrats, reflecting the partisan divide on higher-education financing.

State education budgets have recently slipped; for example, the State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) reported a 1.0 % decline in per-student funding for fiscal 2025, the first drop since 2012. Such trends heighten the relevance of a federal-state match, especially in states that already fund full tuition but leave out ancillary costs like housing and books. If enacted, the act would represent a structural shift from loan-based financing toward comprehensive grant coverage.

With Republicans controlling both chambers of the 119th Congress and the session ending on January 3, 2027, the bill’s immediate prospects appear limited. Nonetheless, its repeated introduction signals a growing policy conversation about debt-free higher education, and families should continue to plan based on existing aid frameworks such as the 2027-28 Student Aid Index chart.