As the rental market evolves, so do the tactics employed by tenant scammers. These fraudsters navigate a complex web of false identities, putting genuine landlords at risk. The financial stakes are significant, and landlords must remain vigilant to protect their resources.
Historically, scams relied on basic tactics such as forged documents and inflated credit reports. However, a more sophisticated network of fraudulent operations has emerged, pushing landlords to enhance their tenant screening processes.
The result? Prospective tenants may feel subjected to rigorous scrutiny akin to a security clearance instead of a straightforward application process.
Table of Contents:
Types of rental fraud affecting landlords
Recent discussions in the industry have identified two main categories of fraud: first-party fraud and third-party fraud. First-party fraud occurs when applicants use their real names but submit altered records regarding their income or employment. In contrast, third-party fraud involves individuals engaging in identity theft, using someone else’s name to secure rental agreements without the victim’s knowledge.
A real-world example
A notable case involved Jared Decker, a Tampa resident who discovered $10,000 missing from his bank account. An imposter had used his identity to secure a lease, resulting in inflated rental charges for properties he had never seen. By the time Decker realized the situation, the fraudster had already moved in, leading to a costly eviction process that ultimately burdened the actual landlords.
The impact of fraud on small landlords
Smaller landlords, often referred to as mom-and-pop operations, represent a significant portion of the rental market—over a third of properties across the United States. These landlords frequently lack the advanced screening resources available to larger corporate entities, making them more vulnerable to fraud. Once a tenant is in place, the legalities surrounding eviction can be both time-consuming and financially draining.
As technology advances, so does the sophistication of fraudulent activities. The rise of artificial intelligence has made it easier for fraudsters to create convincing documents, complicating detection efforts for landlords. Wendy Deetjen, Vice President of a Chicago-based management company, stated that the most pressing issue has been the increase in fraudulent lease applications involving stolen identities. Applicants are now employing advanced methods, including AI-generated documentation, making it harder for landlords to differentiate between legitimate applicants and scammers.
Statistics on fraudulent activity
The National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) conducted a survey indicating that an alarming 93.3% of property managers reported encountering varying degrees of fraud within the last year. The most prevalent form of fraud, affecting 84.3% of respondents, involved falsified documents such as pay stubs and employment verification records. This deceptive practice not only results in financial losses but also increases the risk for landlords renting to individuals with no intention of fulfilling their rental obligations.
Identifying warning signs of rental fraud
Landlords must stay alert during their tenant screening processes. Louie Colella, a leasing expert, pointed out a significant red flag: tenants who apply for leases without physically viewing the property. This practice became more common during the pandemic as landlords adapted by offering virtual tours. While necessary, this shift inadvertently opened the door to potential fraud.
Companies like Greystar, one of the largest residential management firms in the U.S., reported concerning trends, particularly in cities like Atlanta, where nearly half of their rental applications were flagged as suspicious. Other cities have reported rates of fraudulent applications ranging from 14% to 18.5%.
Adopting proactive measures
In response to these challenges, landlords are encouraged to implement rigorous screening protocols. Collaborating with third-party verification services can confirm identity and income. Platforms such as Snappt, which specializes in identity verification, have seen a surge in demand, indicating a shift toward more secure screening methods.
Historically, scams relied on basic tactics such as forged documents and inflated credit reports. However, a more sophisticated network of fraudulent operations has emerged, pushing landlords to enhance their tenant screening processes. The result? Prospective tenants may feel subjected to rigorous scrutiny akin to a security clearance instead of a straightforward application process.0
Historically, scams relied on basic tactics such as forged documents and inflated credit reports. However, a more sophisticated network of fraudulent operations has emerged, pushing landlords to enhance their tenant screening processes. The result? Prospective tenants may feel subjected to rigorous scrutiny akin to a security clearance instead of a straightforward application process.1
