The city’s Department of Public Works is facing significant budgetary challenges in its planned flood mitigation project near Jackson Taylor Park and Jones and Gifford Avenue. The project, which aims to address long-standing flooding issues in the area, has encountered cost concerns that have led the City Council’s finance Committee to table a resolution of support.
Mark Roetzer, the city’s public works director, emphasized the importance of the project during a recent City Council work session. The total project cost is estimated at $5.5 million, with $4.4 million coming from a grant and $1.1 million as the city’s responsibility. Roetzer warned that if the city decides not to pursue the project, the grant money would be lost.
Exploring Cost-Reduction Strategies
The Department of Public Works is actively seeking ways to lower the city’s financial burden. One approach involves utilizing city forces and equipment, which could help reduce costs. Additionally, the department is applying for grants to cover part of the $1.1 million match required by the state.
“We’re currently putting an application together,” Roetzer said. “If we’re able to get that grant, then a large part of our match will be covered. We don’t have any of those in hand, so I can’t say that we’re going to have those, but it’s something that we’re going to continue to do through the life of this project.”
Financial Ramifications and Infrastructure Risks
City Development Director Crystal Surdyk highlighted the critical nature of the project, stating that it is a “pay me now or pay me later” situation. Jones and Gifford Avenue is a vital lifeline for the city, providing access to businesses and connecting to Celoron. Surdyk emphasized that failing to mitigate the flooding could put this crucial infrastructure at risk.
Councilman Doug Scotchmer, chair of the Finance Committee, expressed the need to focus on the potential financial ramifications. He suggested that the council should work closely with Roetzer, Comptroller Ericka Thomas, and Mayor Kim Ecklund to find the most cost-effective way to proceed with the project without compromising other city services.
Alternative Funding Sources and Project Delays
The city is also exploring alternative funding sources, such as CHIPS money and potential reductions in tipping fees at the county landfill. However, Roetzer cautioned that relying on CHIPS money is uncertain, as the state has not provided a definitive answer.
In the meantime, the Minnowbrook culvert project on Water Street has been delayed until the next construction year. Some of the funding initially allocated for this project will be reallocated to cover engineering costs for the flood mitigation project, with the understanding that the money will be restored in next year’s budget.
The last flood mitigation effort in the Jones and Gifford area took place over 50 years ago, underscoring the urgency of the current project. As the city council continues to deliberate, the focus remains on finding a balanced approach that addresses both the immediate need for flood mitigation and the long-term financial health of the city.
